Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) better than Radeon 760M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). The trade-off is that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	85 FPS	46 FPS
medium	74 FPS	29 FPS
high	54 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	69 FPS	32 FPS
medium	60 FPS	19 FPS
high	40 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	12 FPS
medium	25 FPS	8 FPS
high	16 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	3 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	121 FPS	91 FPS
medium	85 FPS	64 FPS
high	58 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	58 FPS
medium	48 FPS	38 FPS
high	35 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	30 FPS
medium	25 FPS	21 FPS
high	20 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	11 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	248 FPS	245 FPS
medium	198 FPS	196 FPS
high	165 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	184 FPS
medium	148 FPS	147 FPS
high	124 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	124 FPS	123 FPS
medium	99 FPS	98 FPS
high	78 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	53 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	141 FPS	154 FPS
medium	109 FPS	120 FPS
high	88 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	104 FPS	109 FPS
medium	81 FPS	87 FPS
high	64 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	65 FPS
medium	49 FPS	52 FPS
high	40 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	30 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Radeon 760M

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,449
Architecture	Xe LPG	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4	512+12700%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz	2599 MHz+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12_2	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)	Radeon 760M
Encoder	QuickSync	VCN 4.0
Decoder	QuickSync	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.