Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) better than Radeon 760M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $300 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). The trade-off is that Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	88 FPS	46 FPS
medium	76 FPS	29 FPS
high	56 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	32 FPS
medium	61 FPS	19 FPS
high	41 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	12 FPS
medium	25 FPS	8 FPS
high	16 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	3 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	119 FPS	87 FPS
medium	93 FPS	61 FPS
high	72 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	86 FPS	56 FPS
medium	65 FPS	36 FPS
high	53 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	52 FPS	29 FPS
medium	39 FPS	21 FPS
high	31 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	11 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	248 FPS	245 FPS
medium	198 FPS	196 FPS
high	165 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	184 FPS
medium	148 FPS	147 FPS
high	124 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	124 FPS	123 FPS
medium	99 FPS	98 FPS
high	81 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	53 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	153 FPS	154 FPS
medium	119 FPS	120 FPS
high	96 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	112 FPS	109 FPS
medium	88 FPS	87 FPS
high	70 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	65 FPS
medium	52 FPS	52 FPS
high	42 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	30 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Radeon 760M

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,449
Architecture	Xe LPG	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4	512+12700%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz	2599 MHz+33%
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.