Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M

Intel

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1950 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) better than Radeon 760M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)?
Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc). The trade-off is that Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
1080p
low88 FPS46 FPS
medium76 FPS29 FPS
high56 FPS21 FPS
ultra36 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS32 FPS
medium61 FPS19 FPS
high41 FPS11 FPS
ultra25 FPS6 FPS
4K
low27 FPS12 FPS
medium25 FPS8 FPS
high16 FPS5 FPS
ultra14 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
1080p
low119 FPS87 FPS
medium93 FPS61 FPS
high72 FPS42 FPS
ultra54 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low86 FPS56 FPS
medium65 FPS36 FPS
high53 FPS28 FPS
ultra41 FPS20 FPS
4K
low52 FPS29 FPS
medium39 FPS21 FPS
high31 FPS16 FPS
ultra23 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
1080p
low248 FPS245 FPS
medium198 FPS196 FPS
high165 FPS163 FPS
ultra124 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS184 FPS
medium148 FPS147 FPS
high124 FPS123 FPS
ultra93 FPS92 FPS
4K
low124 FPS123 FPS
medium99 FPS98 FPS
high81 FPS77 FPS
ultra59 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
1080p
low153 FPS154 FPS
medium119 FPS120 FPS
high96 FPS103 FPS
ultra77 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS109 FPS
medium88 FPS87 FPS
high70 FPS74 FPS
ultra56 FPS58 FPS
4K
low69 FPS65 FPS
medium52 FPS52 FPS
high42 FPS42 FPS
ultra31 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon 760M

Intel

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,500
5,449
Architecture
Xe LPG
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
4
512+12700%
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
2599 MHz+33%
L1 Cache
768 KB+500%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
DirectX
12_2
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
Encoder
QuickSync
VCN 4.0
Decoder
QuickSync
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
366.7
363.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon 760M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Meteor Lake iGPU
Phoenix
Release
December 14 2023
January 31 2024
Ranking
#495
#421