
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon 760M

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,474 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+163% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+102% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 2599 MHz+165% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 128 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2 | 363.3+1028% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













