GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM better than Radeon 760M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,474 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a 2013 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 170W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM?
Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 170W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
1080p
low100 FPS46 FPS
medium86 FPS29 FPS
high68 FPS21 FPS
ultra40 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS32 FPS
medium77 FPS19 FPS
high53 FPS11 FPS
ultra31 FPS6 FPS
4K
low28 FPS12 FPS
medium26 FPS8 FPS
high17 FPS5 FPS
ultra15 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
1080p
low123 FPS91 FPS
medium91 FPS64 FPS
high69 FPS44 FPS
ultra44 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS58 FPS
medium45 FPS38 FPS
high33 FPS29 FPS
ultra23 FPS21 FPS
4K
low25 FPS30 FPS
medium17 FPS21 FPS
high13 FPS17 FPS
ultra9 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
1080p
low246 FPS245 FPS
medium197 FPS196 FPS
high164 FPS163 FPS
ultra123 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS184 FPS
medium148 FPS147 FPS
high123 FPS123 FPS
ultra92 FPS92 FPS
4K
low123 FPS123 FPS
medium99 FPS98 FPS
high82 FPS77 FPS
ultra62 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
1080p
low126 FPS154 FPS
medium100 FPS120 FPS
high85 FPS103 FPS
ultra69 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS109 FPS
medium78 FPS87 FPS
high67 FPS74 FPS
ultra50 FPS58 FPS
4K
low57 FPS65 FPS
medium43 FPS52 FPS
high34 FPS42 FPS
ultra24 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,474
5,449
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1344+163%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
2599 MHz+165%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+250%
32
L1 Cache
112 KB
128 KB+14%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
VCN 4.0
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon 760M
TDP
170W
15W-91%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
241mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
32.2
363.3+1028%