GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 760M better than GeForce GTX 670?

Yes. Radeon 760M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,449 vs 5,361 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 760M is a 2024 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 670 is a 2012 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2012, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon 760M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon 760M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 670 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 670 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 670 is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 5,361 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 670 Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	78 FPS	46 FPS
medium	66 FPS	29 FPS
high	53 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	32 FPS
medium	60 FPS	19 FPS
high	42 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	12 FPS
medium	23 FPS	8 FPS
high	15 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 670 Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	123 FPS	87 FPS
medium	88 FPS	61 FPS
high	65 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	56 FPS
medium	45 FPS	36 FPS
high	32 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	29 FPS
medium	17 FPS	21 FPS
high	13 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 670 Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	241 FPS	245 FPS
medium	193 FPS	196 FPS
high	161 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	184 FPS
medium	145 FPS	147 FPS
high	121 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	123 FPS
medium	96 FPS	98 FPS
high	80 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 670 Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	150 FPS	154 FPS
medium	110 FPS	120 FPS
high	94 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	109 FPS
medium	89 FPS	87 FPS
high	76 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	65 FPS
medium	49 FPS	52 FPS
high	39 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 670 Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670 and Radeon 760M

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,361	5,449+2%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1344+163%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock	980 MHz	2599 MHz+165%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	112+250%	32
L1 Cache	112 KB	128 KB+14%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
Encoder	NVENC (3rd Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (1st Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 82 C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	Radeon 760M
TDP	170W	15W-91%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	82 C	80°C-2%
Perf/Watt	31.5	363.3+1053%