G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1360% higher power demand at 219W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 219W, a 204W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

2010

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 219W, a 204W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌1360% higher power demand at 219W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a 2010 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2010, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 40nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $349 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 219W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 219W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	81 FPS	46 FPS
medium	69 FPS	29 FPS
high	55 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	32 FPS
medium	61 FPS	19 FPS
high	44 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	12 FPS
medium	23 FPS	8 FPS
high	15 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	83 FPS	87 FPS
medium	63 FPS	61 FPS
high	52 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	50 FPS	56 FPS
medium	36 FPS	36 FPS
high	25 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	29 FPS
medium	16 FPS	21 FPS
high	12 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	248 FPS	245 FPS
medium	198 FPS	196 FPS
high	165 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	184 FPS
medium	148 FPS	147 FPS
high	124 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	124 FPS	123 FPS
medium	99 FPS	98 FPS
high	82 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	164 FPS	154 FPS
medium	134 FPS	120 FPS
high	120 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	113 FPS	109 FPS
medium	94 FPS	87 FPS
high	84 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	65 FPS
medium	52 FPS	52 FPS
high	42 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and Radeon 760M

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,449
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	480	512+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+279%
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	60+88%	32
L1 Cache	960 KB+650%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	System
Bus Width	320-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 174.4% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2	Radeon 760M
TDP	219W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	25.1	363.3+1347%