Arc A310 vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Arc A310

2022

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 760M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 54.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 760M better than Arc A310?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,438 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon 760M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 75W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A310 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $100 MSRP. Radeon 760M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 760M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and FSR upscaling.

Is Arc A310 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Arc A310 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $100 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 760M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A310 Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	65 FPS	46 FPS
medium	44 FPS	29 FPS
high	33 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	47 FPS	32 FPS
medium	28 FPS	19 FPS
high	18 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	20 FPS	12 FPS
medium	13 FPS	8 FPS
high	9 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	3 FPS

Open Arc A310 Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	182 FPS	87 FPS
medium	154 FPS	61 FPS
high	116 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	56 FPS
medium	93 FPS	36 FPS
high	73 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	20 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	29 FPS
medium	55 FPS	21 FPS
high	44 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	11 FPS

Open Arc A310 Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	245 FPS	245 FPS
medium	196 FPS	196 FPS
high	163 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	184 FPS
medium	147 FPS	147 FPS
high	122 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	122 FPS	123 FPS
medium	98 FPS	98 FPS
high	82 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	53 FPS

Open Arc A310 Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	245 FPS	154 FPS
medium	196 FPS	120 FPS
high	163 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	109 FPS
medium	147 FPS	87 FPS
high	122 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	65 FPS
medium	87 FPS	52 FPS
high	77 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	30 FPS

Open Arc A310 Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A310 and Radeon 760M

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 6 RT cores (Arc A310) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,438	5,449
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.072 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2599 MHz+30%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+746%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	6	8+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	124 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A310	Radeon 760M
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	169mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-19%	80°C
Perf/Watt	72.5	363.3+401%