GRID P40-1Q vs Radeon 680M

GRID P40-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P40-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P40-1Q better than Radeon 680M?
Yes. GRID P40-1Q is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,839 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GRID P40-1Q is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 680M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P40-1Q can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $3,000 MSRP. GRID P40-1Q is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GRID P40-1Q is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $3,000 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 680M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 225W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GRID P40-1Q?
Yes. Radeon 680M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID P40-1Q. The trade-off is that GRID P40-1Q currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
1080p
low103 FPS127 FPS
medium85 FPS113 FPS
high67 FPS94 FPS
ultra40 FPS70 FPS
1440p
low86 FPS111 FPS
medium72 FPS93 FPS
high51 FPS76 FPS
ultra29 FPS57 FPS
4K
low28 FPS47 FPS
medium26 FPS44 FPS
high17 FPS32 FPS
ultra15 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
1080p
low128 FPS161 FPS
medium101 FPS128 FPS
high82 FPS95 FPS
ultra63 FPS63 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS107 FPS
medium65 FPS82 FPS
high53 FPS62 FPS
ultra40 FPS45 FPS
4K
low41 FPS54 FPS
medium32 FPS43 FPS
high29 FPS34 FPS
ultra24 FPS22 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium138 FPS138 FPS
high115 FPS115 FPS
ultra86 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low130 FPS129 FPS
medium104 FPS104 FPS
high86 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low86 FPS86 FPS
medium69 FPS69 FPS
high58 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS43 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium138 FPS138 FPS
high115 FPS115 FPS
ultra86 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low130 FPS129 FPS
medium104 FPS104 FPS
high86 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low77 FPS86 FPS
medium60 FPS69 FPS
high49 FPS58 FPS
ultra36 FPS43 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-1Q and Radeon 680M

NVIDIA

GRID P40-1Q

The GRID P40-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,839 points.

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-1Q scores 3,839 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-1Q) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-1Q) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
G3D Mark Score
3,839
3,836
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+43%
3.379 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2200 MHz+87%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-1Q) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
DirectX
12_1
12_2
Max Displays
0
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
17.1
76.7+349%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P40-1QRadeon 680M
MSRP
$3000
Codename
GM204
Rembrandt+
Release
August 30 2015
January 3 2023
Ranking
#525
#512