
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 880M
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 880M
2014Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 680M better than GeForce GTX 880M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 880M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon 680M

GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,826 | 3,836 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.05 TFLOPS | 3.379 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 2200 MHz+122% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 880M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 880M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 880M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCN 3.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | VCN 3.1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 83.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 50W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 76.7+144% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












