GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon 680M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

2014Core: 954 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 880M

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 680M better than GeForce GTX 880M?
Yes. Radeon 680M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,836 vs 3,826 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 680M is a 2023 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 880M is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 680M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 680M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon 680M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 680M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (50W vs 122W), and FSR upscaling.
Is GeForce GTX 880M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 880M is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 680M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
1080p
low128 FPS127 FPS
medium109 FPS113 FPS
high88 FPS94 FPS
ultra53 FPS70 FPS
1440p
low110 FPS111 FPS
medium93 FPS93 FPS
high66 FPS76 FPS
ultra39 FPS57 FPS
4K
low39 FPS47 FPS
medium35 FPS44 FPS
high21 FPS32 FPS
ultra18 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
1080p
low122 FPS166 FPS
medium93 FPS132 FPS
high70 FPS98 FPS
ultra45 FPS65 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS109 FPS
medium47 FPS82 FPS
high35 FPS62 FPS
ultra23 FPS45 FPS
4K
low25 FPS55 FPS
medium18 FPS42 FPS
high14 FPS34 FPS
ultra10 FPS22 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
1080p
low172 FPS173 FPS
medium138 FPS138 FPS
high115 FPS115 FPS
ultra86 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS129 FPS
medium103 FPS104 FPS
high86 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low86 FPS86 FPS
medium69 FPS69 FPS
high57 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS43 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
1080p
low172 FPS173 FPS
medium138 FPS138 FPS
high115 FPS115 FPS
ultra86 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS129 FPS
medium103 FPS104 FPS
high86 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low86 FPS86 FPS
medium69 FPS69 FPS
high57 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS43 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon 680M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
G3D Mark Score
3,826
3,836
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1536+100%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.05 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock
993 MHz
2200 MHz+122%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 880M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
DirectX
12_0
12_2
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCN 3.1
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
VCN 3.1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 83.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MRadeon 680M
TDP
122W
50W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
31.4
76.7+144%