GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon 680M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

2013Core: 823 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 780M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 780M better than Radeon 680M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 780M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 3,845 vs 3,836 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 780M is a 2013 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 680M is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 680M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 780M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce GTX 780M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 780M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 680M is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 122W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GeForce GTX 780M?
Yes. Radeon 680M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 122W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 780M. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 780M currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
1080p
low77 FPS127 FPS
medium66 FPS113 FPS
high52 FPS94 FPS
ultra34 FPS70 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS111 FPS
medium60 FPS93 FPS
high42 FPS76 FPS
ultra27 FPS57 FPS
4K
low25 FPS47 FPS
medium23 FPS44 FPS
high15 FPS32 FPS
ultra13 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
1080p
low120 FPS161 FPS
medium88 FPS128 FPS
high67 FPS95 FPS
ultra43 FPS63 FPS
1440p
low66 FPS107 FPS
medium44 FPS82 FPS
high32 FPS62 FPS
ultra22 FPS45 FPS
4K
low24 FPS54 FPS
medium16 FPS43 FPS
high13 FPS34 FPS
ultra9 FPS22 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium138 FPS138 FPS
high115 FPS115 FPS
ultra87 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low130 FPS129 FPS
medium104 FPS104 FPS
high87 FPS86 FPS
ultra65 FPS65 FPS
4K
low87 FPS86 FPS
medium69 FPS69 FPS
high58 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS43 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
1080p
low153 FPS173 FPS
medium125 FPS138 FPS
high112 FPS115 FPS
ultra86 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS129 FPS
medium93 FPS104 FPS
high83 FPS86 FPS
ultra59 FPS65 FPS
4K
low65 FPS86 FPS
medium51 FPS69 FPS
high42 FPS58 FPS
ultra28 FPS43 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon 680M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780M scores 3,845 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
G3D Mark Score
3,845
3,836
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1536+100%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock
797 MHz
2200 MHz+176%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 780M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_2
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
VCN 3.1
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
VCN 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780M draws 122W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 83.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon 680M
TDP
122W
50W-59%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
31.5
76.7+143%