
GeForce GTX 780M
Popular choices:

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 780M
2013Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 122W, a 72W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌144% higher power demand at 122W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 780M better than Radeon 680M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 680M make more sense than GeForce GTX 780M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon 680M

GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.

Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780M scores 3,845 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,845 | 3,836 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.448 TFLOPS | 3.379 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 2200 MHz+176% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 680M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 780M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | VCN 3.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780M draws 122W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 83.7% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 50W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5 | 76.7+143% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












