
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 better than Quadro P3200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Quadro T1000

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1404 MHz | 1455 MHz+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 130.1+50% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #292 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












