
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P3000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P3000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P3000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P3000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 better than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Quadro T1000

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,385 | 6,505+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz | 1455 MHz+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.1 | 130.1+53% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The Quadro T1000 costs 33.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro T1000 offers 53.8% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $400-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 16.3+54% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #380 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












