
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
- ❌35.3% longer card at 211mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 211mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌185.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 211mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
- ❌35.3% longer card at 211mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌185.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro T1000

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,505+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1455 MHz+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 211mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 130.1+43% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 65% less ($260 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 178.5% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-65% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+179% | 16.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | TU117 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #381 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













