
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅80% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅80% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile better than Quadro RTX 6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 201 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,157 points.

Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile scores 18,157 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 320 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,157+2% | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+131% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1770 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.5 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 72+80% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 576+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-56% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 157.9+130% | 68.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6300 |
| Codename | TU104B | TU102 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #172 | #99 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












