
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,801 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1182.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 215W instead of 260W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅37.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅80% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1162.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 36.4 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌20.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 215W.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,801 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1182.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.4 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 215W instead of 260W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅37.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅80% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1162.5% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 36.4 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌20.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 215W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER better than Quadro RTX 6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 779 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 635 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 611 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 201 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 9 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,166 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER scores 18,166 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 9.062 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 320 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,166+2% | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.062 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+80% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.5 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 72+80% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 576+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER draws 215W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 18.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W-17% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.5+23% | 68.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER costs 92.1% less ($5801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.4 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER offers 1200% better value. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-92% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4+1200% | 2.8 |
| Codename | TU104 | TU102 |
| Release | July 9 2019 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #97 | #99 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












