
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,542 less on MSRP ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 726.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅148.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1070 SLI: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌731.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$758 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 23.5 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $758 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
2016Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,542 less on MSRP ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 726.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅148.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1070 SLI: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌731.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$758 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 23.5 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $758 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 6000 better than GeForce GTX 1070 SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 201 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,790 points.

Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI scores 17,790 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,790 | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1770 MHz+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 200% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 768 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 (2x) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 (2x) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI draws 300W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 260W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 68.8+16% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI launched at $758 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI costs 88% less ($5542 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.5 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI offers 739.3% better value. The Quadro RTX 6000 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $758-88% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5+739% | 2.8 |
| Codename | Pascal GP104 SLI | TU102 |
| Release | August 16 2016 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #142 | #99 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












