
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅71.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌78.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 160W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 285W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12.5% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅71.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 138.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 285W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌78.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 160W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12.5% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 14,925 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 111.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 240 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+112% | 14,925 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+233% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+463% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+69% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+226% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+67% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 288+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+13% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 56.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 160W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+19% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 11.1% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 138% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-11% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+138% | 16.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | TU104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #11 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












