
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173.3% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅14.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌173.3% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro RTX 4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro RTX 4000

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 14,925 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 13.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1545 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 4000) with 112 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+14% | 14,925 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+79% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+15% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+52% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 36+29% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 288+157% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) — a 24.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s+24% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 6.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 160W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+7% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 63.4% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 211.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-63% | $899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+211% | 16.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU104 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #114 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












