
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅60.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
2025Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅60.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 4000 better than GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) and Quadro RTX 4000

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2287 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,014 points.

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) scores 15,014 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8,192 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 2287 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,014 | 14,925 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 8192+256% | 2304 |
| Boost Clock | 2287 MHz+48% | 1545 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) draws 80W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-50% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 187.7+101% | 93.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $899 |
| Codename | GN22-X9 | TU104 |
| Release | January 2 2025 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












