
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ❌16% higher power demand at 290W vs 250W.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 290W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2021Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 290W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ❌16% higher power demand at 290W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P6000 better than GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU make more sense than Quadro P6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU and Quadro P6000

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,196 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU scores 15,196 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,196 | 15,512+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+60% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+72% | 12.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+8% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+329% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 193% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 23.438 GB+193% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU draws 290W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 14.8% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 290W | 250W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.4 | 62.0+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5999 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP102 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #50 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












