Arc B580 vs Quadro P6000

Intel

Arc B580

2024Core: 2670 MHzBoost: 2670 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc B580

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2381.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 190W instead of 250W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

  • 95.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 23 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 2309.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 31.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 190W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc B580 better than Quadro P6000?
Yes. Arc B580 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 15,977 vs 15,512 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc B580 is a 2024 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro P6000 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Arc B580 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Arc B580 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $249 MSRP. Arc B580 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc B580 is about $5,750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $5,999 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $249 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (190W vs 250W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Quadro P6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Quadro P6000 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $5,999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc B580 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetArc B580Quadro P6000
1080p
low226 FPS245 FPS
medium212 FPS233 FPS
high191 FPS200 FPS
ultra149 FPS164 FPS
1440p
low183 FPS226 FPS
medium152 FPS192 FPS
high136 FPS155 FPS
ultra111 FPS129 FPS
4K
low95 FPS123 FPS
medium80 FPS103 FPS
high68 FPS78 FPS
ultra60 FPS72 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetArc B580Quadro P6000
1080p
low412 FPS373 FPS
medium348 FPS322 FPS
high262 FPS238 FPS
ultra204 FPS189 FPS
1440p
low243 FPS229 FPS
medium207 FPS195 FPS
high165 FPS157 FPS
ultra132 FPS125 FPS
4K
low119 FPS110 FPS
medium97 FPS90 FPS
high80 FPS74 FPS
ultra62 FPS57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetArc B580Quadro P6000
1080p
low719 FPS698 FPS
medium575 FPS558 FPS
high479 FPS465 FPS
ultra359 FPS349 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS524 FPS
medium431 FPS419 FPS
high359 FPS349 FPS
ultra270 FPS262 FPS
4K
low359 FPS349 FPS
medium288 FPS279 FPS
high240 FPS233 FPS
ultra180 FPS175 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetArc B580Quadro P6000
1080p
low719 FPS566 FPS
medium575 FPS492 FPS
high479 FPS418 FPS
ultra359 FPS343 FPS
1440p
low539 FPS452 FPS
medium431 FPS396 FPS
high359 FPS319 FPS
ultra270 FPS260 FPS
4K
low359 FPS279 FPS
medium288 FPS266 FPS
high240 FPS229 FPS
ultra180 FPS175 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc B580 and Quadro P6000

Intel

Arc B580

The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.

NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Graphics Performance

The Arc B580 scores 15,977 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B580 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Arc B580) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 2670 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
G3D Mark Score
15,977+3%
15,512
Architecture
Xe2
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560
3840+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.67 TFLOPS+8%
12.63 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2670 MHz+62%
1645 MHz
ROPs
80
96+20%
TMUs
160
240+50%
L1 Cache
5 MB+257%
1.4 MB
L2 Cache
18 MB+500%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 95.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 456 GB/s (Arc B580) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 5.6% advantage for the Arc B580. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B580) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
23.438 GB+95%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
456 GB/s+6%
432 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
18 MB+500%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B580) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: Xe2 Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
Encoder
Xe2 Media Engine
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder
Xe2 Media Engine
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc B580 draws 190W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 27.3% difference. The Arc B580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B580) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 272mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
TDP
190W-24%
250W
Recommended PSU
600W-8%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
272mm
267mm
Height
115mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
84.1+36%
62.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc B580 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. The Arc B580 costs 95.8% less ($5750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B580) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the Arc B580 offers 2369.2% better value. The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureArc B580Quadro P6000
MSRP
$249-96%
$5999
Performance per Dollar
64.2+2369%
2.6
Codename
BMG-G21
GP102
Release
December 13 2024
October 1 2016
Ranking
#132
#141