Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro P600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 40W, a 12W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 40W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 40W, a 12W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌42.9% higher power demand at 40W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P600 better than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,311 vs 3,318 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P600 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P600 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro P600 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro P600 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (28W vs 40W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs make more sense than Quadro P600?

Yes. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (28W vs 40W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P600. The trade-off is that Quadro P600 currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Benchmark Check

Quadro P600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
1080p
low	78 FPS	32 FPS
medium	69 FPS	22 FPS
high	49 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	65 FPS	21 FPS
medium	57 FPS	14 FPS
high	36 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	12 FPS
medium	23 FPS	8 FPS
high	14 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	4 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Open Quadro P600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
1080p
low	86 FPS	79 FPS
medium	58 FPS	50 FPS
high	40 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	58 FPS	22 FPS
medium	34 FPS	16 FPS
high	25 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	7 FPS
medium	18 FPS	4 FPS
high	14 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	3 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Open Quadro P600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
1080p
low	149 FPS	149 FPS
medium	119 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	112 FPS	112 FPS
medium	89 FPS	90 FPS
high	74 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	75 FPS
medium	60 FPS	60 FPS
high	50 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Open Quadro P600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
1080p
low	137 FPS	149 FPS
medium	107 FPS	119 FPS
high	87 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	102 FPS	112 FPS
medium	81 FPS	90 FPS
high	64 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	75 FPS
medium	48 FPS	60 FPS
high	39 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	37 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Open Quadro P600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro P600

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
G3D Mark Score	3,311	3,318
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Pascal
Process Node	10 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	96	384+300%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1620 MHz+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 has 2 GB. The Quadro P600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
DirectX	12.1	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
Encoder	QuickSync	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	QuickSync	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs draws 28W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 35.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro P600
TDP	28W-30%	40W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	118.3+43%	83.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0 MSRP, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs Infinity (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 offers NaN% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).