Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P600

CPU

GPU

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Xe Graphics G7

Shared System RAM 30

3,311

0.0%

3,318

+0.2%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P600 better than Iris Xe Graphics G7?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,311 vs 3,318 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P600 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P600 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P600 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Iris Xe Graphics G7 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Iris Xe Graphics G7 make more sense than Quadro P600?

Yes. Iris Xe Graphics G7 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (30W vs 40W), and staying closer to $200 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P600. The trade-off is that Quadro P600 currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Iris Xe Graphics G7 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Quadro P600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
1080p
low	80 FPS	32 FPS
medium	70 FPS	22 FPS
high	50 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	21 FPS
medium	58 FPS	14 FPS
high	37 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	12 FPS
medium	23 FPS	8 FPS
high	14 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	4 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 Open Quadro P600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
1080p
low	122 FPS	79 FPS
medium	85 FPS	50 FPS
high	58 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	22 FPS
medium	48 FPS	16 FPS
high	35 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	7 FPS
medium	25 FPS	4 FPS
high	20 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	3 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 Open Quadro P600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
1080p
low	149 FPS	149 FPS
medium	119 FPS	119 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	112 FPS	112 FPS
medium	89 FPS	90 FPS
high	74 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	75 FPS
medium	60 FPS	60 FPS
high	50 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 Open Quadro P600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
1080p
low	139 FPS	149 FPS
medium	109 FPS	119 FPS
high	88 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	104 FPS	112 FPS
medium	82 FPS	90 FPS
high	64 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	75 FPS
medium	49 FPS	60 FPS
high	40 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	37 FPS

Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 Open Quadro P600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P600

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 384 (Quadro P600).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
G3D Mark Score	3,311	3,318
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Pascal
Process Node	10 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	96	384+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 has 2 GB. The Quadro P600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
DirectX	12.1	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
Encoder	QuickSync	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	QuickSync	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro P600
TDP	30W-25%	40W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	110.4+33%	83.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0. The Quadro P600 costs 100+% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs Infinity (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).