GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Quadro P600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011Core: 575 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 35.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M SLI across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 485M SLI better than Quadro P600?
Yes. GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 35.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.3% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2011 instead of 2017, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 35.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.3% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro P600 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
When does Quadro P600 make more sense than GeForce GTX 485M SLI?
Yes. Quadro P600 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (40W vs 100W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 485M SLI. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 485M SLI currently gives you 1.3% higher G3D Mark and 35.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
1080p
low77 FPS32 FPS
medium64 FPS22 FPS
high49 FPS14 FPS
ultra32 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS21 FPS
medium55 FPS14 FPS
high38 FPS7 FPS
ultra24 FPS6 FPS
4K
low24 FPS12 FPS
medium22 FPS8 FPS
high14 FPS5 FPS
ultra12 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
1080p
low67 FPS79 FPS
medium45 FPS50 FPS
high33 FPS37 FPS
ultra21 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low38 FPS22 FPS
medium21 FPS16 FPS
high15 FPS11 FPS
ultra11 FPS8 FPS
4K
low13 FPS7 FPS
medium8 FPS4 FPS
high6 FPS4 FPS
ultra5 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
1080p
low151 FPS149 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high101 FPS100 FPS
ultra76 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low113 FPS112 FPS
medium91 FPS90 FPS
high76 FPS75 FPS
ultra57 FPS56 FPS
4K
low76 FPS75 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high50 FPS50 FPS
ultra38 FPS37 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
1080p
low135 FPS149 FPS
medium108 FPS119 FPS
high92 FPS100 FPS
ultra74 FPS75 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS112 FPS
medium82 FPS90 FPS
high70 FPS75 FPS
ultra56 FPS56 FPS
4K
low58 FPS75 FPS
medium45 FPS60 FPS
high36 FPS50 FPS
ultra27 FPS37 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Quadro P600

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI scores 3,360 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is built on Fermi while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 384 (Quadro P600).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
G3D Mark Score
3,360+1%
3,318
Architecture
Fermi
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI draws 100W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
TDP
100W
40W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
92°C
Perf/Watt
33.6
83.0+147%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485M SLIQuadro P600
MSRP
$0
Codename
N11E-GTX-A1
GP107
Release
January 6 2011
February 7 2017
Ranking
#542
#558