
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Popular choices:

Quadro P600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.
Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
2013Quadro P600
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P600 better than GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition make more sense than Quadro P600?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and Quadro P600

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Quadro P600
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,318 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7112 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS+75% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 144 KB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1 MB (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 40W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 66.2 | 83.0+25% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0. The Quadro P600 costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.2 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs Infinity (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK107 | GP107 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #735 | #558 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












