
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅74.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅74.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro P5200

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro P5200's 11,650 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 74.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+74% | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+90% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+81% | 8.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1746 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 160+5% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+411% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 100W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 116.5+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20.2% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 118.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+118% | 23.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












