
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design better than Quadro P5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and Quadro P5200

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,461 | 11,650+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz | 1746 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+145% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-20% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 143.3+23% | 116.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | TU106B | GP104 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #237 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












