
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5200 better than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design and Quadro P5200

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design scores 11,566 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,566 | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.516 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1746 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design draws 150W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 40% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1 | 116.5+51% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #257 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












