Arc A770M vs Quadro P5200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770M

2022

Why buy it

✅75.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Arc A770M

2022

Quadro P5200

2018

Why buy it

✅75.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770M better than Quadro P5200?

Yes. Arc A770M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Arc A770M averages 75.7% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,853 vs 11,650 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A770M is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro P5200 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 4 GB, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 75.7% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P5200 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Arc A770M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Quadro P5200 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Quadro P5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P5200 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $500 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Arc A770M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770M Benchmark Check

Quadro P5200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
1080p
low	223 FPS	117 FPS
medium	207 FPS	106 FPS
high	181 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	77 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	102 FPS
medium	170 FPS	87 FPS
high	140 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	137 FPS	54 FPS
medium	115 FPS	48 FPS
high	92 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	36 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro P5200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
1080p
low	376 FPS	289 FPS
medium	324 FPS	239 FPS
high	263 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	232 FPS	192 FPS
medium	204 FPS	161 FPS
high	167 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	118 FPS	101 FPS
medium	98 FPS	83 FPS
high	83 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	55 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro P5200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
1080p
low	533 FPS	513 FPS
medium	427 FPS	419 FPS
high	356 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	393 FPS
medium	320 FPS	315 FPS
high	267 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	248 FPS
medium	213 FPS	205 FPS
high	178 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	124 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro P5200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
1080p
low	533 FPS	334 FPS
medium	427 FPS	272 FPS
high	356 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	208 FPS
1440p
low	400 FPS	253 FPS
medium	320 FPS	202 FPS
high	267 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	133 FPS
medium	213 FPS	109 FPS
high	178 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	77 FPS

Open Arc A770M Open Quadro P5200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Quadro P5200

Arc A770M

The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1746 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
G3D Mark Score	11,853+2%	11,650
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.79 TFLOPS+88%	8.94 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+17%	1746 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	6 MB+538%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Arc A770M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770M	Quadro P5200
TDP	120W	100W-17%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	98.8	116.5+18%