
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 988.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌991.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 988.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌991.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER make more sense than Quadro P5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Quadro P5000

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+3% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+49% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the Quadro P5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-31% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5+44% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 90.8% less ($2270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 986.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-91% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4+986% | 5.1 |
| Codename | TU116 | GP104 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #207 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












