
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353 | 11,625+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+70% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz+70% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 256+167% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+173% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+6% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+112% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4999 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM200 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #102 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












