
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro M5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅22.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $551 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 308.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌221.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅22.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $551 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 308.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌221.3% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro M5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro M5500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro M5500's 7,915 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 27.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1165 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+27% | 7,915 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+86% | 4.772 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+49% | 1165 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5500 has 8 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (Maxwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 150W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+6% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro M5500 launched at $800. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 68.9% less ($551 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.9 (Quadro M5500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 308.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+308% | 9.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #321 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













