
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $622 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 653.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌368% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $622 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 653.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌368% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro M4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro M4000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 60.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+61% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+171% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+45% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+389% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 25.6% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 211 GB/s+26% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+130% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.6% less ($622 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 657.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $791 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+657% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | GM204 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #252 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












