
HD Graphics P630
Popular choices:

Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
HD Graphics P630
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P630: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
HD Graphics P630
2016Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics P630: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro 4000M better than HD Graphics P630?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does HD Graphics P630 make more sense than Quadro 4000M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P630 and Quadro 4000M

HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.

Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P630 scores 1,280 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P630) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,280 | 1,287 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 336+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 0.6384 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000M has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 85.3+561% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Quadro 4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF104 |
| Release | August 5 2016 | February 22 2011 |
| Ranking | #822 | #801 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













