
Core i5-1038NG7
Popular choices:

Processor U300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1038NG7
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,823 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1344 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1344 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Core i5-1038NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1038NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1038NG7
2020Processor U300
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1344 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,823 vs 8,897).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1344 with DDR4, while Processor U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Core i5-1038NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1038NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor U300 better than Core i5-1038NG7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 163 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 222 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1038NG7 and Processor U300

Core i5-1038NG7
Core i5-1038NG7
The Core i5-1038NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 8,823 points. Launch price was $320.

Processor U300
Processor U300
The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1038NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Processor U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-1038NG7 versus 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Processor U300 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Processor U300 uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1038NG7 scores 8,823 against the Processor U300's 8,897 — a 0.8% lead for the Processor U300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1038NG7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 5 / 6+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+67% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 8,823 | 8,897 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the FCBGA1344 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1344 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1038NG7) / not specified (Processor U300). The Core i5-1038NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1038NG7 targets Premium Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1038NG7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












