Core i7-4800MQ
Popular choices:
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4800MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 125W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4800MQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,773).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌166% higher power demand at 125W vs 47W.
Core i7-4800MQ
2013Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 125W, a 78W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4800MQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,773).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌166% higher power demand at 125W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4800MQ better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 35 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 93 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 134 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4800MQ and Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Core i7-4800MQ
Core i7-4800MQ
The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Phenom II X6 1100T BE's 5,745 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4800MQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 5,773 | 5,745 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 508 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4800MQ) / AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enthusiast Legacy |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4800MQ launched at $380 MSRP, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE debuted at $265. On MSRP ($380 vs $265), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE is $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — making the Phenom II X6 1100T BE the 35.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | $265-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 21.7+43% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-4800MQ and Phenom II X6 1100T BE
