
Core i7-4720HQ
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4720HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 125W, a 124W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,714 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4720HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Core i7-4720HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌12400% higher power demand at 125W vs 1W.
Core i7-4720HQ
2015Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 125W, a 124W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4720HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,714 vs 5,745).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Core i7-4720HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌12400% higher power demand at 125W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1100T BE better than Core i7-4720HQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 93 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4720HQ and Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Core i7-4720HQ
Core i7-4720HQ
The Core i7-4720HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,714 points. Launch price was $378.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4720HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-4720HQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4720HQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4720HQ scores 5,714 against the Phenom II X6 1100T BE's 5,745 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i7-4720HQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
| Feature | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 5,714 | 5,745 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 508 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4720HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4720HQ) / AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Core i7-4720HQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enthusiast Legacy |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













