
Core i7-4710MQ
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4710MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 125W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 15.3 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4710MQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,792).
- ❌166% higher power demand at 125W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-4710MQ
2013Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 125W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.7 vs 15.3 PassMark/$ ($265 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4710MQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $265 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,792).
- ❌166% higher power demand at 125W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4710MQ better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 93 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4710MQ and Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Core i7-4710MQ
Core i7-4710MQ
The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4710MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-4710MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710MQ scores 5,792 against the Phenom II X6 1100T BE's 5,745 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-4710MQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 950 vs 508, a 60.6% lead for the Core i7-4710MQ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 5,792 | 5,745 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 950+87% | 508 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4710MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i7-4710MQ) and AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE).
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE). The Core i7-4710MQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop, Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Laptop | Enthusiast Legacy |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4710MQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE debuted at $265. On MSRP ($378 vs $265), the Phenom II X6 1100T BE is $113 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4710MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — making the Phenom II X6 1100T BE the 34.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $265-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 21.7+42% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












