Core i5-8265U vs Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Intel

Core i5-8265U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2010

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-8265U

2018

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 620, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

2010

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-8265U.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,812).
  • Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Core i5-8265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8265U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8265U better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Phenom II X6 1100T BE is ahead with a 17.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-8265U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i5-8265U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $265 MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Phenom II X6 1100T BE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8265U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
1080p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium134 FPS140 FPS
high105 FPS113 FPS
ultra83 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS137 FPS
medium115 FPS116 FPS
high90 FPS92 FPS
ultra70 FPS75 FPS
4K
low68 FPS63 FPS
medium58 FPS56 FPS
high45 FPS44 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
1080p
low111 FPS144 FPS
medium95 FPS144 FPS
high89 FPS144 FPS
ultra70 FPS139 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS144 FPS
medium82 FPS144 FPS
high77 FPS144 FPS
ultra63 FPS125 FPS
4K
low75 FPS144 FPS
medium67 FPS137 FPS
high56 FPS122 FPS
ultra43 FPS93 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
1080p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS144 FPS
4K
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS134 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
1080p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS144 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS144 FPS
4K
low145 FPS144 FPS
medium145 FPS144 FPS
high145 FPS144 FPS
ultra145 FPS144 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8265U and Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Intel

Core i5-8265U

The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

AMD

Phenom II X6 1100T BE

The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8265U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U versus 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-8265U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8265U scores 5,812 against the Phenom II X6 1100T BE's 5,745 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-8265U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 508, a 81% lead for the Core i5-8265U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+5%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz+106%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Thuban (2010)
PassMark
5,812+1%
5,745
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,200+136%
508
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8265U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-8265U versus DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — the Core i5-8265U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8265U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-8265U) and AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE).

FeatureCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
Socket
FCBGA1528
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE). The Core i5-8265U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 620), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop, Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.

FeatureCore i5-8265UPhenom II X6 1100T BE
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Enthusiast Legacy