
Core i5-8265U
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-8265U
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 620, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-8265U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,812).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Core i5-8265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8265U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-8265U
2018Phenom II X6 1100T BE
2010Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 620, while Phenom II X6 1100T BE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-8265U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1100T BE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1100T BE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,745 vs 5,812).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $265 MSRP, while Core i5-8265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8265U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-8265U better than Phenom II X6 1100T BE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 93 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 144 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8265U and Phenom II X6 1100T BE

Core i5-8265U
Core i5-8265U
The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Phenom II X6 1100T BE
The Phenom II X6 1100T BE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8265U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U versus 3.7 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-8265U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8265U scores 5,812 against the Phenom II X6 1100T BE's 5,745 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-8265U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 508, a 81% lead for the Core i5-8265U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+106% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 5,812+1% | 5,745 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200+136% | 508 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8265U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-8265U versus DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Phenom II X6 1100T BE — the Core i5-8265U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8265U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-8265U) and AMD 870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1100T BE).
| Feature | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1100T BE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1100T BE). The Core i5-8265U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 620), while the Phenom II X6 1100T BE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop, Phenom II X6 1100T BE targets Enthusiast Legacy.
| Feature | Core i5-8265U | Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | Enthusiast Legacy |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












