
Phenom II X6 1075T
Popular choices:

Xeon W5580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W5580.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W5580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $245 MSRP, while Xeon W5580 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W5580
2009Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,459 vs 3,500).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Xeon W5580
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W5580.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W5580, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $245 MSRP, while Xeon W5580 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,459 vs 3,500).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1075T better than Xeon W5580?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1075T and Xeon W5580

Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T
The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.

Xeon W5580
Xeon W5580
The Xeon W5580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,459 points. Launch price was $102.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1075T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon W5580 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Phenom II X6 1075T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W5580 — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1075T (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon W5580 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1075T scores 3,500 against the Xeon W5580's 3,459 — a 1.2% lead for the Phenom II X6 1075T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W5580.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+1% | 3.46 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Gainestown (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,500+1% | 3,459 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,896 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 679 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,960 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W5580 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T) / not specified (Xeon W5580). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Xeon W5580 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













