
Phenom II X6 1075T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($245 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,896 vs 14,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +355.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 523.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌22% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$245 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Phenom II X6 1075T
2010Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($245 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +355.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 523.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,896 vs 14,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌22% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$245 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Phenom II X6 1075T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 7 5700X

Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X6 1075T
The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X6 1075T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1075T scores 3,500 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 153.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,896 vs 14,000 (152.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 679 vs 2,116, a 102.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,960 vs 9,715 (132.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Thuban (2010) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 3,500 | 26,609+660% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,896 | 14,000+638% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 679 | 2,116+212% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,960 | 9,715+396% |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1075T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X6 1075T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 880G,890GX,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1075T) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X6 1075T launched at $245 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($245 vs $299), the Phenom II X6 1075T is $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1075T delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 144.7% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X6 1075T | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $245-18% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 89.0+522% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












