PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Phenom II X6 1075T

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($245 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,500 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +358.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 377.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
34.3% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$245 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.

Phenom II X6 1075T

2010

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($245 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +358.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 377.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $245 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,500 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($245 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌
34.3% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$245 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1075T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Phenom II X6 1075T?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 358.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 540.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 358.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better fit. You are getting 540.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is 34.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $245 MSRP, and it gives you a 358.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 377.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010), 433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Phenom II X6 1075T Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	88 FPS	200 FPS
medium	88 FPS	163 FPS
high	88 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	156 FPS
medium	88 FPS	121 FPS
high	88 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	84 FPS
medium	56 FPS	71 FPS
high	43 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	44 FPS

Open Phenom II X6 1075T Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	525 FPS
high	88 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	545 FPS
medium	88 FPS	471 FPS
high	88 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	350 FPS
medium	88 FPS	304 FPS
high	88 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	242 FPS

Open Phenom II X6 1075T Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	561 FPS
high	88 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	561 FPS
high	88 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	499 FPS
medium	88 FPS	394 FPS
high	88 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	275 FPS

Open Phenom II X6 1075T Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	561 FPS
high	88 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	561 FPS
high	88 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	561 FPS
medium	88 FPS	501 FPS
high	88 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	396 FPS

Open Phenom II X6 1075T Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X6 1075T and Ryzen 7 3700X

Phenom II X6 1075T

The Phenom II X6 1075T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $260.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Phenom II X6 1075T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1075T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the Thuban (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X6 1075T scores 3,500 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 146% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1075T vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	32 MB+433%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture	Thuban (2010)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,500	22,430+541%
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,896	—
Geekbench 6 Single	679	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,960	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X6 1075T uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1075T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X6 1075T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 880G,890GX,890FX,970,990FX (Phenom II X6 1075T) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	AM3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1075T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Phenom II X6 1075T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1075T rivals Core i5-750.

Feature	Phenom II X6 1075T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Phenom II X6 1075T launched at $245 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($245 vs $329), the Phenom II X6 1075T is $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X6 1075T delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 130.7% better value option.