
Core i7-2715QE
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1045T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-2715QE
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Phenom II X6 1045T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1045T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,221 vs 3,244).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2715QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2715QE
2011Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Phenom II X6 1045T needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Phenom II X6 1045T across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,221 vs 3,244).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2715QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom II X6 1045T better than Core i7-2715QE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2715QE and Phenom II X6 1045T

Core i7-2715QE
Core i7-2715QE
The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

Phenom II X6 1045T
Phenom II X6 1045T
The Phenom II X6 1045T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,244 points. Launch price was $175.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1045T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1045T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1045T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X6 1045T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the Phenom II X6 1045T's 3,244 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X6 1045T. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,221 | 3,244 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 587 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1045T). The Core i7-2715QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Phenom II X6 1045T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i7-2715QE | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













