
Core i5-4570T
Popular choices:

Phenom II X6 1045T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-4570T
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD 4600, while Phenom II X6 1045T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X6 1045T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,223 vs 3,244).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4570T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4570T.
Core i5-4570T
2013Phenom II X6 1045T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD 4600, while Phenom II X6 1045T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Phenom II X6 1045T.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,223 vs 3,244).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1045T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4570T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4570T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4570T better than Phenom II X6 1045T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4570T and Phenom II X6 1045T

Core i5-4570T
Core i5-4570T
The Core i5-4570T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,223 points. Launch price was $222.

Phenom II X6 1045T
Phenom II X6 1045T
The Phenom II X6 1045T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,244 points. Launch price was $175.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4570T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1045T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1045T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4570T versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1045T — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4570T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-4570T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4570T scores 3,223 against the Phenom II X6 1045T's 3,244 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X6 1045T. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total) on the Core i5-4570T vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1045T.
| Feature | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+7% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4096 kB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,223 | 3,244 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,719 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4570T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1045T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-4570T) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1045T). The Core i5-4570T includes integrated graphics (HD 4600), while the Phenom II X6 1045T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4570T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-4570T | Phenom II X6 1045T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













