
M2
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 120W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 62,323).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +76.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β500% higher power demand at 120W vs 20W.
M2
2022Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 120W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +76.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 62,323).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β500% higher power demand at 120W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than M2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D β a 48.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.424 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 β a 122.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.48 GHz | 5.7 GHz+64% |
| Base Clock | 2.424 GHz | 4.2 GHz+73% |
| L3 Cache | β | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+1900% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 14,933 | 62,323+317% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M2) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the M2 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












