
M2
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 105W, a 85W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 38,955).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +59.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β425% higher power demand at 105W vs 20W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.
M2
2022Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 105W, a 85W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +59.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 38,955).
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β425% higher power demand at 105W vs 20W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M2 moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than M2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 and Ryzen 9 5900X
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The M2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.48 GHz on the M2 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X β a 31.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.424 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X is built on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 scores 14,933 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 β a 89.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.48 GHz | 4.8 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.424 GHz | 3.7 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | β | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+3900% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | β | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 14,933 | 38,955+161% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The M2 uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M2) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | M2 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












