
Core i5-12500TE
Popular choices:

M2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12500TE
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β75% higher power demand at 35W vs 20W.
M2
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 35W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 15,008).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12500TE
2022M2
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while M2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Draws 20W instead of 35W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while M2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β75% higher power demand at 35W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (14,933 vs 15,008).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500TE better than M2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12500TE and M2

Core i5-12500TE
Core i5-12500TE
The Core i5-12500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,008 points. Launch price was $299.
M2
M2
The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500TE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the M2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-12500TE versus 3.48 GHz on the M2 β a 21.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500TE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core i5-12500TE is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12500TE scores 15,008 against the M2's 14,933 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-12500TE.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+24% | 3.48 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.424 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1500% |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 15,008 | 14,933 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 659 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500TE) / not specified (M2). The Core i5-12500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the M2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500TE rivals Core i5-12400T.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













