
Arc B570
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- β 55.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $281 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 132.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- β Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β128.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- β33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Arc B570
2025Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- β 55.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $281 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 132.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- β Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- βFewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β128.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- β33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than Intel Arc Pro B60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Arc Pro B60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 155 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 155 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Intel Arc Pro B60

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060+2% | 13,807 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+4% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 20+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) β the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W β a 28.6% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75Β°C vs 82.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C-9% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+36% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500. The Arc B570 costs 56.2% less ($281 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) β the Arc B570 offers 132.6% better value.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-56% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+133% | 27.6 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #169 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













