
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A30M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Intel Arc Pro A30M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,918 | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz | 2000 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 0% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 118.4+1% | 117.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













