PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅+23.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $1,630 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Delivers 290.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 310W, a 185W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w7-3545 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 68 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w7-3545

2023

Why buy it

✅+125% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,300 vs 2,846).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,200 vs 18,980).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌148% higher power demand at 310W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon w7-3545

2023

Why buy it

✅+23.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $1,630 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Delivers 290.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 310W, a 185W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w7-3545 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+125% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 68 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,300 vs 2,846).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,200 vs 18,980).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌148% higher power demand at 310W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon w7-3545?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w7-3545 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 17.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $1,630 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $2,039 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 290.5% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 28.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3545 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 125% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 30 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-3545 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
1080p
low	284 FPS	311 FPS
medium	268 FPS	301 FPS
high	223 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	270 FPS
medium	200 FPS	233 FPS
high	159 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	184 FPS
medium	134 FPS	157 FPS
high	103 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	106 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w7-3545

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
1080p
low	689 FPS	682 FPS
medium	580 FPS	593 FPS
high	484 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	551 FPS
medium	525 FPS	489 FPS
high	441 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	324 FPS
medium	314 FPS	288 FPS
high	295 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	234 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w7-3545

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
1080p
low	648 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	530 FPS	1057 FPS
high	467 FPS	974 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	834 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	1001 FPS
medium	491 FPS	888 FPS
high	427 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	600 FPS
medium	374 FPS	517 FPS
high	339 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	397 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w7-3545

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
1080p
low	970 FPS	1212 FPS
medium	883 FPS	1015 FPS
high	766 FPS	925 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	809 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	980 FPS
medium	740 FPS	845 FPS
high	642 FPS	736 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	635 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	727 FPS
medium	515 FPS	632 FPS
high	463 FPS	557 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w7-3545

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon w7-3545

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon w7-3545

The Xeon w7-3545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 310 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 58,453 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w7-3545 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3545 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3545 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon w7-3545's 58,453 — a 24.3% lead for the Xeon w7-3545. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,300, a 21.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 16,200 (15.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3545.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+13%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	67.5 MB+125%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,784	58,453+28%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+24%	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+17%	16,200

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3545 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3545). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3545) — the Xeon w7-3545 offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3545).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3545 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon w7-3545 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon w7-3545 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w7-3545
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3545 debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($409 vs $2039), the Core i7-13700K is $1630 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 28.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3545 — making the Core i7-13700K the 118.4% better value option.